文章被拒稿怎么办，附重投申诉模板书 – sci666

假期结束了，上班后打开邮箱的那一刻，你发现里面躺着一份来自某某期刊的一封邮件，里面的内容讲述的是一个悲伤的故事，你被拒稿了！

好不容易码出了一篇论文，老板也点头了，接下来投出去，“飞黄腾达”指日可待啊！可初次投稿就被伤得体无完肤，本着扶我起来，我还能做的态度，今天我能就来学习一下如何抢救论文。

官方表达：很抱歉，本刊物录用率在10%-25%左右，您的稿件不能被录用。因此，在排除了没有投错期刊的可能后，此类文章已经没有了再抢救的必要，虽然杂志社没说啥审稿意见，但是他已经用另外一种方式告诉你：我没看上你的文章，外审也不用了。PS：因为语言不好被拒稿的还是少见的（除非那种写得看不懂），最不济杂志社会让作者先去修改语言再重新上传稿件。

1. 改投，注意核对期刊的收录范围；

2. 写邮件给杂志社死缠烂打，温馨提示成功率极低；

3. 把文章改一改重新投这本杂志，有啥杂志社主编在眼瞎的情况下会觉得这是两篇文章。

通常情况下，SCI会给2到4名审稿人审阅稿件，文章会在拒绝信中逐个列出和总结审稿人的意见。因此，如果一半的评审员给出了更好的意见，并且拒绝提交，他们可以写信给编辑部重新提交机会。

1. 据理力争：你认为自己的论文虽然有许多不足但没有致命缺陷，或者觉得审稿人自身有所局限，你就可以提交申诉信，据理力争（注意礼貌啊，虽然有些时候期刊的编辑找的审稿人未必是你所涉及的领域的专家，导致审稿意见看似不够专业，但还是要婉地表达自己的意见，只要自己是正确的就应该坚持，这就是学术本身的意义所在）或者建议该杂志换审稿人。

2. 修改后重新投稿：你的实验设计有严重缺陷啊，数据不足啊，但有一半的审稿人表示看好你哦，就可以给编辑部写信争取重投的机会，这就叫“可再投性拒稿”。这个最适合抢救了，等到数据足量，分析更合理时，修改修改，主编重新受理的可能性很大。

3. 改投

Dear Dr. orProf. XXXX,

Thank youfor your efficient work in processing our manuscript entitled “XXXX (文章题目)” (文章编号).

After wehave carefully read the comments from the reviewers, we realize that the majormerits of our work were not fully identified or recognized by the reviewers.Here we would emphasize that the most notable merits of our manuscript include：接着说你论文的优点. However,the some of the comments have limitations: 接着说下你觉得哪些审稿意见有问题。

I will bemost grateful if you could offer us a second opportunity (or an additionalopportunity if the rejected manuscript is already a revised one).Look forwardto hearing from you soon.

Yourssincerely，

You Name

DearEditor,

Thanksfor your email. I am sorry to learn that our manuscript was rejected based onthe comments “XXXX” (被拒稿的原因), however, XXXX(写反驳理由). As such, I wouldlike to ask if you could send it to a third referee for a review and thenreconsider your decision? Thank you very much for your help!

Iam looking forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,

You Name

DearEditor,

Thank you for your kind attention to consider ourmanuscript. We have not the slightest grudge against the rejection. However,the reviewer’s report is quite unconvincing and unfair, or, if we may say,somewhat irresponsible for our work. So, we have to give a rebuttal against thecomments of the first and the only reviewer by accommodating the reviewer’scomments.

XXXX（针对审稿意见写反驳理由）

Inshort, we could not accept the comments given by the reviewer #1, and we wouldbe very grateful if the editor can justify our rebuttals and reconsider ourmanuscript.

Thankyou very much for your patience and understanding.

Best regards,

Your Name